In Oklahoma, a contentious election is brewing as voters face a decision on whether to oust three sitting Supreme Court justices. The campaign, led by People for Opportunity, is pushing for their removal, accusing them of being “activist liberal judges.” Critics, however, view the effort as an attempt to eliminate the last moderating force in the state’s increasingly conservative political landscape.
The group argues that the justices have blocked “common sense lawsuit reform” and were appointed by a nonpartisan commission, rather than being elected. The campaign to remove them has sparked the formation of a pro-justice group, Protect Our Freedoms, which highlights the importance of a balanced judiciary.
The unusual opportunity to push out the justices comes from Oklahoma’s unique Supreme Court appointment system, which was established in response to a bribery scandal in the 1960s. However, no judge has ever been ousted through this process.
The campaign’s funding, led by People for Opportunity and affiliated with the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, has raised questions about transparency and motives. Critics fear that the effort may have unintended consequences, leading to the rejection of other judges on the ballot.
Former Governor David Walters warns against the radical conservative influence that could result from removing the justices, highlighting the potential impact on the state’s political landscape. The outcome of this election could have significant ramifications for Oklahoma’s judiciary and serve as a testing ground for out-of-state political interests.
Source
Photo credit www.huffpost.com